War “Compensation” according to lawyers, they concern the relationship between the individual and the state, and war ones “Repair” state relations only. The latter problem is complicated by the fact that after World War II there was no (though it should have been) peace conference on the example, for example, that of Paris (1919-1920) which de facto ended WW1. Often referred to as the Potsdam Peace Conference (17 July 1945 – 2 August 1945) never mind yes to the name. This is an introduction, so people will know what big money is all about, which the aforementioned report will (presumably) determine. loss. In international law, improvements must be made. And it’s not just PiS that demands them. Already in March 2004 Sejm required by a decisionline Republic of Poland to recover from Germany war indemnities due to Poland for the losses and damages suffered by Poland as a result of the planned devastation carried out by Germany during World War II, and to initiate talks with the government of the Federal Republic of Germany for this purpose.” In justification of the draft resolution, it is written as follows:Biased Statement of the Government of the Polish People’s Republic on the decision of the Government of the USSR regarding German August 23, 1953, claims for damages were waived in favor of Poland from German Democratic Republic…” (Although the wording of the decision uses the word “German”).

In resignation wrote, among other things: “Given that Germany has made changes large enough to the extent that their obligations relate to compensation and that the improvement of Germany’s economic situation is in the interests of peaceful development, the government of the Polish People’s Republic – wishes to make further contributions to the work of solving the German Question in a peaceful and democratic spirit and in accordance with the interests of the Polish people and all peace-loving countries – decided to give up on January 1, 1954 repayment of claims in the interests of Poland”. It’s hard to imagine communists donate imperialist payments NRF (as it was later called in the German Demoludes). However, this generalization holds up constraint Poland, current claims.

Turns out (I thought) the fix was due to Poland, but… There is a problem. Even more than one. Example – on January 14, 1946 in Paris, USA, France and Great Britain, together with fifteen Western allies International Repair Commission. It was then designated percentage share in the Western reparations of each of its members. The value is included in the repair confiscated property German. And about that they remember some criticism of the claims made by the current government against Germany, but … Looking at the matter from a different perspective, it turns out that they are wrong to assume that Poland has expropriated German assets (in the so-called Reacquired Territories along with them) as compensation to disappear (after September 17, 1939) eastern region. Poland has lost more than 20 percent. your territory because 179,649 sq km “Taking over” the Soviet Union (which made up 46% of the territory before the war of the Second Polish Republic), and receiving it “in return” 103,788 sq km at the expense of Germany (it accounts for 33 percent of the country’s territory in a new dimension).

No one wants to pay voluntarily. Especially when second page dispute believes that there is no legal basis for this. Opposition CDU chief vote (on 27 July) – Friedrich Merzo. While visiting Warsaw, he met the president of PiS. – We are talking about repair claims that are constantly being made in Poland. I told (Kaczyński – SE) that we don’t see any legal basis for such reparations claims, but we see a lot of political reasons to develop a project with the Polish government, with Poland, for example for security with us – Merz told reporters …