Therefore, he appealed to the Supreme Court to cancel the one year prison sentence which was suspended for two years and was completely acquitted of the charges. But the Senate led by Jiří Pácal erased his longing.
The crime occurred one night in August last year. The man and his friend got behind the wheel of a black Renault Traffic, they set off a blue flare outside the window and set off in search of an unsuspecting victim.
They first stopped at a bus stop, where a man attacked several people waiting for not wearing masks. Her behavior was such that one of the ladies-in-waiting even burst into tears.
The head of the prosecutor’s office in Rokycany gave his wife a fight. Now he’s been charged with disorderly conduct
Moments later, they blocked the path of a woman returning home from work on a scooter. The man scolds him to remain silent in the name of law. He then got out and walked towards the woman, slamming the hood of his vehicle with the palm of his hand several times.
The woman later testified that the whole situation was very stressful for her, because she was afraid that the men would load her up and take her away.
It was just a joke, the defendant said
When they had had enough fun at the woman’s expense, they went to the next bus stop, where the man got off and walked quickly towards the waiting people asking if something was going on, if there were any reports of criminal activity here, and do they have anything to do with it. The men then chased the other two people into the house.
Based on the lower court’s decision, the respondents felt that they were plainclothes police officers and were concerned about their actions.
The man claimed in his appeal that it was just a joke and that no one thought he was a real police officer.
Prosecutor: Fun? Worse!
“His actions were not carried out with the intention of disrupting the peaceful coexistence of citizens, public peace and order, or causing third parties to fear for their safety, health or property. “The motive and motivation for the defendant’s actions was simply entertainment,” wrote the man’s attorney in the appeal.
Entertainment as a motive is more shameful from the point of view of general morality than mere laziness or stupidity of the perpetrator.
The Attorney General’s Office believes that his party refuses to accept that the actions were carried out just for fun. “Such a motive is more outrageous from the standpoint of common morality than any other motive – than simply the perpetrator’s laziness or stupidity,” the lead prosecutor wrote.
Witness a panic attack
The Senate of the Supreme Court, in the decision taken by Novinky, stated that the man acted very authoritatively, which, among other things, caused a panic attack in one of the witnesses.
“The defendant’s actions must be considered riotous behavior that grossly violates the rules of civil coexistence,” the judge wrote.
They don’t even understand the argument that it’s just fun. “Pleasure as a motive for criminal activity is more likely to be a testimony against the perpetrator,” the judge added, dismissing the appeal as clearly without merit.
Police charged eight people who stormed into the courtroom with Peterkova
“Unapologetic social media guru. General reader. Incurable pop culture specialist.”
